EteRNA is a game developed by scientists at Carnegie Mellon University and Stanford University. Players solve puzzles related to the folding of RNA molecules and can also suggest new puzzles. The program takes advantage of human problem-solving capabilities. A better understanding of RNA design and structure prediction may facilitate the design of RNA-based nanomachines and switches.

Solve puzzles related to the folding of RNA molecules
               midcore | puzzle | medicine | computer (browser)                


Scientific American – on Citizen Science Games

Can You Diagnose Dementia from a Gaming App? By Bahar Gholipour on November 18, 2016 SAN DIEGO—You are guiding a ship through rough waters. On your way you may encounter magical creatures. You can snap […]

Wired, on citizen science games

Sea Hero Quest game aims to diagnose dementia by testing navigation skills By AMELIA HEATHMAN, 17 November 2016 2.4 million people have downloaded the app created by neuroscientists to help them understand dementia. Hilary Evans, […]

More articles


Eterna: Principles for Predicting RNA Secondary Structure Design Difficulty

Designing RNAs that form specific secondary structures is enabling better understanding and control of living systems through RNA-guided silencing, genome editing and protein organization. Little is known, however, about which RNA secondary structures might be […]

Online citizen science games: opportunities for the biological sciences

Recent developments in digital technologies and the rise of the internet have created new opportunities for citizen science. One of these has been the development of online citizen science games where complex research problems have […]

More publications


Adrien Treuille (EteRNA), excerpt of the interview for Forbes

Adrien Treuille, an assistant professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon University, creates online challenges that tap gamers to solve complex scientific problems. Players of Foldit, an Internet video game he co-developed as a biochemistry […]

More interviews


  • Rate this
  • Summary
Current Average Ratings
Contribution to science
Avg: 0/5
Value to humanity
Avg: 0/5
Avg: 0/5
Fun factor
Avg: 0/6
Total Avg Rating: 0.00 out of 5 with based on 0 rating(s)
Contribution to science
Value to humanity
Fun factor